Creatine monohydrate is the main product of creatine supplements. But there are still many new types of creatine emerging, such as Creatine HCL. As we all know, this creatine has various magical benefits. Are they really better than creatine monohydrate? This does not seem to be the case.

The main disadvantage of creatine monohydrate is its relatively low solubility and stability. The main benefits of several new types of creatine are high absorption rate, no effect period, no need to consume with sugar. In fact, these are just the manufacturer's propaganda. Although the absorption rate of new creatine is actually higher than that of creatine monohydrate. However, more research is needed to clarify the impact of its use. Judging from the results of objective scientific research, there is no clear evidence that these new products are better than creatine mono, and there is a lack of research on side effects. When you search for the keyword creatine supplements, most relevant data studies mainly use creatine monohydrates. The method used is a traditional supplementary method that focuses on the shock period.

The new type of creatine is a new supplement. It still needs to be proven by long-term experimental studies, including effectiveness and side effects, as well as the method of use. We must also have this calm and objective attitude towards supplements.